‘Killing’ of Dalit youth on Bangladesh border: Complaint to NHRC against BSF

‘Killing’ of Dalit youth on Bangladesh border: Complaint to NHRC against BSF

Counterview Desk 
Kirity Roy, Secretary, Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha (MASUM), and National Convenor, Programme Against Custodial Torture & Impunity (PACTI), Hooghly, West Bengal, in a letter to the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) chairman, has alleged “extra-judicial execution” of a poor young Dalit, Prakash Barmar, who was “shot dead on his head from point blank” by the Border Security Force (BSF) personnel on the Bangladesh border.
Roy, in his complaint, said, “Firing of BSF and subsequent death of Barman is a result of trigger happy BSF”, noting, “BSF version is that the victim was associated with cross border smuggling. If the man is actually a smuggler then in which Indian law it is stated that a smuggler can be shot dead by BSF?” He wonders, “As per complaint of BSF, they fired for “self defense.” What type of injury received by the guards which compel them to fire?”

Text:

I want to draw your attention towards another incident of extra-judicial execution of a poor young man belonging from Scheduled caste community of Chamta village under Sitai police station area of Coochbehar district in West Bengal. The victim, Prakash Barman, aged about 35 years was shot on his head from point blank range by BSF personnel attached with West Chamta Border Out Post, Gandarmarka, 75 Battalion, Border Security Force.
On the very moment when M Ajay Kumar Bhalla, IAS, was visiting West Bengal and pursuing for more power to BSF, those killings happened which shocked the state.
Prakash Barman is the sole earning member of his family consisting of four members. On November 12, 2021 at about 2 am some BSF personnel attached with West Chamta Border Out Post, 75 Battalion caught Barman and fired bullet from point blank range which directly hit his head. After receiving bullet, the body of Barman was lying there for more than about 9 hours.
Fact finding of MASUM reveals some valuable points on this killing. Those are:

  • There was no discussion, no warning, no incident of attack, no tension prevail / happened at the time of firing by BSF.
  • There is no reason for firing by the BSF at that time.
  • BSF fired total 7 round bullets.
  • Primarily BSF fired 6 rounds bullets which hit three Bangladeshi men’s body and later fired one bullet from the point blank range to Barman.
  • Why was Barman’s body not taken to the hospital after shooting rather he was left at the place of occurrence for more than about 9 hours?
  • Firing of BSF and subsequent death of Barman is a result of trigger happy BSF.
  • BSF version is that the victim was associated with cross border smuggling. If the man is actually a smuggler then in which Indian law it is stated that a smuggler can be shot dead by BSF?
  • If Barman was attached with smuggling activities, the on duty BSF easily can apprehend him and brought before court of law. Which they didn’t.
  • BSF fired at Barman from point blank range and the place of firing is one kilometer inside territory from the international border.
  • Police officials of Sitai Police Station sent the body of the victim to the police station without taking him to the hospital at first or call a doctor at the place of occurrence.
  • As per complaint of BSF, they fired for “self defense.” What type of injury received by the guards which compel them to fire?

The incident violates the rights guaranteed in Article 21 of Indian Constitution and also the premise of Article 6 and 7 of International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights as well as the Goal No 8, 9 and 16 of Sustainable Development Goal earmarked by United Nations and in both these international instruments; the government of India is a party and have agreement.

The perpetrators also violated the article 2,3,5,6 and 8 of Code of Conduct for Law Enforcement Officials; Adopted by General Assembly resolution 34/169 of 17 December 1979 and basic tenets of Eighth United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders.
Under the circumstances we demand:

  • The BSF must be posted in actual border area and not inside villages
  • This incident of killing is showing systematic killing with impunity is going on regularly, which should be stopped.
  • The whole incident must be investigated by a neutral agency appointed by the Commission.
  • The guilty Border Security Force personnel involved must be booked and prosecuted in open court of law
  • Kingpins of international cattle smuggling business must be booked.
  • The family of the victim must be compensated
  • Security and safety of the witnesses and the family of victim must be protected.

Killing to an accused is a criminal philosophy. The rule of law has rightly been accorded space in the Basic structure doctrine by the Constitution of India. Rule of law is the fundamental principle of governance of any civilized liberal democracy. The fundamental premise of rule of law is that every human being, including smugglers and the worst criminals, are entitled to basic human rights and due process.
The bulwarks of democracy, Police, BSF and other administrative officials do not have any interest to understand this and therefore, when any state authority reported that the victim was a smuggler, they think that ‘bullet is the right way for the smugglers’. Even a smuggler has a right to life and personal liberty enshrined in our Constitution. But the perpetrators are powerful enough and they did not show minimum respect to the Constitution of our country.
Therefore, I request to your Commission to look upon the whole incidents kindly take stern legal action on the human rights issue of a citizen in this country and even non citizens. Article 21 of Indian Constitution applies for both to citizens as well as non citizens.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *